Finally, Unite Here gifts three says demanding reverse of your award out-of damages: (1) the new demo legal erred within the enabling the introduction of unsubstantiated and you may speculative pro testimony about your quantity of Sutter Health’s injuries; (2) brand new damages try an excessive amount of; and (3) the brand new problems was duplicative.

Unite Right here contends the fresh judge erred when you look at the doubting their action for the limine to help you preclude Sutter Health’s expert, William Ackerman, out of testifying the postcard triggered 10s out of millions of dollars when you look at the destroyed diligent profits. Unify Here asserts Ackerman’s view lacks basis and that’s unsound as the it is premised on the conjecture, speculation, and you will presumptions that aren’t backed by the fresh new number. We differ.

Good mock postcard are sent to for every single girl exactly who agreed to be involved in the survey, and each try paid back $5 to own acting

The latest demonstration judge has actually broad discretion to help you admit or ban pro testimony, and its particular decision will never be disturbed missing a manifest punishment of discretion. (People v. Robbie (2001) ninety-five Cal.Application.4th 1075, 1083.) Zero like abuse out of discretion is demonstrated in the present circumstances. Czytaj dalej We need address just the first allege into the guidance off the newest trial court to the remand →